How to Record FaceTime Calls on iPhone and Mac

Are you searching the How to Record FaceTime Calls on iPhone and Mac? Let’s take a look

Introduction:

FaceTime video calls are a wonderful way for families separated by distance to connect, but the app lacks a built-in feature to record these moments for future enjoyment. Beyond personal use, recording FaceTime calls is handy for creating podcasts or capturing work-related discussions. This article provides a guide on how to record FaceTime calls on both iPhone/iPad and Mac, addressing legal considerations surrounding call recording.

Recording FaceTime on Mac:

Mac serves as an excellent platform for FaceTime calls, offering a larger screen and straightforward screen recording options.

For Mojave or Catalina:

Press Command + Shift + 5 to access screenshot tools.
Choose between “Record Entire Screen” or “Record Selected Portion.”
Click the Record button, ensuring the Internal Microphone is selected for audio.
Initiate the FaceTime call; your screen remains usable during recording.
Stop recording by clicking the small Stop button or using Command + Shift + 5.
Locate the recording on your desktop, and play it in QuickTime.

Using QuickTime:

Open QuickTime and select File > New Screen Recording.
Choose the recording area and ensure the microphone is selected.
Start the FaceTime call and stop recording when finished.
Save the recording via File > Save.

Recording FaceTime on iPhone/iPad:

Recording FaceTime calls on iOS devices requires different methods, each with its own considerations.

iOS Screen Recording:

Ensure the screen recording icon is in Control Center (Settings > Control Center > Customize Controls).
Open Control Center and tap the screen recording icon.
Start the FaceTime call; note that audio recording is not available due to legal restrictions.
Stop recording in Control Center, and find the video in Photos.

Record via Mac (with Audio):

Connect the iPhone/iPad to a Mac and open QuickTime.
Select File > New Movie Recording.
Choose the connected device as the camera source.
Start recording and initiate the FaceTime call.
Stop recording and save the video.

Legal Considerations:

Recording FaceTime calls without consent may raise legal issues. Laws vary, but the general principle is to seek consent or notify the other party, especially concerning audio recordings. In some places, one-party consent is acceptable, while others mandate all-party consent. Understand the laws in your region and seek legal advice when necessary.

By following these steps, you can effectively capture and relive your FaceTime conversations, ensuring memories and valuable discussions are preserved. Always be mindful of legal considerations and privacy when recording calls.

Share your thoughts regarding How to Record FaceTime Calls on iPhone in our comments section.

Fitbit Versa 4 Review

Fitbit Versa 4 Review : The Fitbit Versa 4, succeeding the Versa 3 released in 2020, offers an affordable option that amalgamates Fitbit’s latest fitness, health, and smartwatch features within its design.

This latest model reintroduces the physical button and introduces new apps from Google, continuing with familiar features from the Versa 3. However, despite these updates, the question remains: does this make it one of the finest smartwatches currently available?

The Fitbit Versa 4 review stands as a sturdy activity, sleep, and wellness tracker packaged as a smartwatch. Yet, it’s worth noting that the exclusion of certain important features diminishes its “smart” capabilities compared to previous Versa models in our article Fitbit Versa 4 Review.

Pros:

• Comfortable for continuous wear throughout the day and night.
• Excellent for monitoring sleep patterns and daily activities.
• Reintroduction of a physical button enhances interaction.

Cons:

• Reduced smartwatch functions.
• FitbitOS interface may feel sluggish and segmented.
• Limited differences compared to Versa 3.

Design & Display:

Square design featuring rounded edges.

The return of a physical button.

Utilizes the same AMOLED screen as the Versa 3.

While the initial impression may suggest minimal change from the Versa 3, the key alteration is the reintroduction of a physical button to the watch’s slightly curved, square aluminum case. This brings back the convenience of swiftly accessing main menu screens or manually activating the display, eliminating the need to tap on the sides of the case as in the Versa 3. The reimplementation of buttons adds practicality, a welcome move by Fitbit.

Apart from this alteration, it closely resembles the Versa 3. It features the classic Fitbit silicone straps available in large and small sizes and easily detachable from the case. Fitbit offers various materials and strap designs. The watch maintains its water resistance of 5 ATM (up to 50 meters deep) suitable for pool swim tracking.

The device boasts a 40mm AMOLED display that can remain on continuously or be activated with support for wake-up gestures. The display responds well and though not the market-leading AMOLED, it offers crisp, vibrant colors and the characteristic deep black associated with such screens. Visibility remains good both indoors and outdoors, particularly excellent in indoor settings.

Available color options include graphite, platinum, or copper-pink aluminum cases. The graphite version, accompanied by a black strap in our review, appears the most understated, yet there are various color choices to customize the strap’s appearance, lending the Versa 4 a touch of individuality and style.

Functions:

Built-in GPS for outdoor exercise tracking.
Integration of Google Maps and Google Wallet.
Tracking capabilities for steps, sleep, and heart rate.
Alexa and Bluetooth calling support.

The Versa 4 incorporates many features reminiscent of the Sense 2, missing only some significant health-focused options. Additionally, it leverages certain smartwatch capabilities from the Google Pixel Watch, which aligns with the Fitbit family’s ecosystem.

Notably, the significant additions come from Google, offering pre-installed Google Maps and Google Wallet functionalities, absent in the Versa 3. Although Fitbit Pay is available, the Fitbit AppGallery has undergone substantial reduction, resulting in the removal of numerous third-party apps. However, the watch still offers a variety of watch faces available for download.

Regarding health and fitness tracking, the device retains built-in GPS to monitor outdoor workouts. Its built-in motion sensors facilitate daily step counting, sleep tracking, and more precise tracking of indoor activities, including swimming in a pool.

The Fitbit PurePulse optical heart rate sensor technology enables continuous heart rate tracking throughout the day, during sleep, and during exercise. This sensor aids in measuring power metrics such as zone activity minutes and cardio fitness metrics for those engaging in regular workouts. Furthermore, it can set notifications for irregular heart rhythms, contributing to its robust health tracking features.

The watch also supports a skin temperature sensor and blood oxygen level tracking, providing additional metrics for general health information, though it’s not intended for medical purposes.

Fitness & Smartwatch Performance:

Still excels more as a fitness tracker than a sports watch.

Decrease in support for third-party apps and music functionality.

Certain metrics/features may require Fitbit Premium subscription.

Comparing the Versa 4 to its predecessor, the Versa 3, there have been significant changes in its capabilities, especially from a smartwatch standpoint.

It still serves as a platform for checking notifications in a straightforward manner, offering integration with Amazon Alexa for useful voice commands and the ability to make Bluetooth calls. However, controlling music playback from your phone or downloading audio directly to the device is no longer supported. Furthermore, the Fitbit AppGallery has been removed, limiting the availability of third-party apps to high-profile options from Google.

Regarding Google apps, the Versa 4 offers Google Maps and Wallet functionality. Surprisingly, Google Assistant, which was available in the Versa 3, is absent. To utilize Google Maps, users need to download a dedicated app and set up support within the Fitbit companion app on their phone. Consequently, the experience reflects what’s already available on the phone, providing convenience without introducing any new functionalities besides the ease of access on the wrist.

Using FitbitOS on the Versa 4 delivers a generally good experience, yet there are occasional lags while navigating through screens. The addition of a physical button provides quicker access to settings and apps, and the widgets for displaying tracking stats and weather details are well-optimized. Nevertheless, the system feels somewhat limited compared to other operating systems, such as WearOS, which powers the Google Pixel Watch.

Regarding fitness tracking capabilities, the Versa 4 excels in basic functionalities like step counting, continuous heart rate monitoring, and reliable sleep tracking. However, when it comes to more comprehensive sports tracking, it falls short compared to competitors like the Apple Watch or Samsung Galaxy Watch. The sports features lack depth in metrics, long-term accuracy during workouts, and user-friendly experience beyond casual activities like jogging or swimming.

The built-in GPS isn’t as accurate as similarly priced Garmin running watches, and the heart rate monitoring accuracy is notably inferior to a chest strap equipped with a heart rate monitor, especially during intense workouts.

In terms of wellness and health monitoring, the Versa 4 lacks certain advanced sensors found in models like the Sense 2, such as an ECG sensor or an EDA sensor for deeper insights into heart health and stress management. Nevertheless, it provides guided breathing exercises and the ability to log stress scores based on sleep data, exercise records, and heart rate. Additionally, it offers irregular heart rhythm notifications, which, during testing, were fortunately not triggered even once.

The stress-monitoring features, like many other Fitbit software functionalities, make it simple to check stress levels. They rely on reliably tracked data, making it a potentially good indicator of one’s overall stress levels.

Battery Life of Fitbit Versa 4 Review:

The Fitbit Versa 4 boasts an impressive battery life, lasting over 6 days on a single charge. Even more convenient, a mere 12-minute charge can provide enough power to sustain the watch for an entire day. However, if you opt for the always-on display feature, the battery life reduces to about 3 days. While it may not match the endurance of certain other smartwatches like the Huawei Watch, it significantly surpasses many high-end models in this aspect.

In my experience, I’ve found that without using the always-on display, the Versa 4 easily stretches to a week on a full charge. Activating the always-on screen slightly diminishes this, bringing the battery life down to below three days. The usage of features like GPS can notably impact the battery life, draining it faster compared to continuous monitoring features like heart rate, which appear to be more power-efficient.

Fitbit includes a convenient fast charging feature that offers a quick boost to the battery. Just 12 minutes on the charging cradle can provide enough power for daytime tracking, akin to what was available in the Versa 3.

Verdict in Fitbit Versa 4 Review:

Despite the slightly reduced smartwatch capabilities compared to the Versa 3, the Fitbit Versa 4 remains a top contender as a fitness-tracking watch. It excels in monitoring daily activities and sleep patterns, and its focus on overall well-being and stress monitoring is commendable. Additionally, its user-friendly interface, customization options, and impressive battery life make it a strong choice.

However, for those seeking a more balanced array of sports, health, and smartwatch features, other options like the Apple Watch SE or Samsung Galaxy Watch might be worth considering, even though they may sacrifice a bit on battery life. The future trajectory of the Versa 4 as a smartwatch may also be affected, especially with the emergence of the Pixel Watch, which seems to receive more attention from Google and encompasses broader functionalities than Fitbit’s smartwatch lineup. We have tried Fitbit Versa 4 Review based on our experience with this devices. Share your thoughts regarding Fitbit Versa 4 Review / Fitness Smartwatch Review in our comment section.

An innovative breakthrough from ZF could potentially revolutionize the dynamics of hybrid and electric vehicles by eliminating conventional fluid-based systems.

Steering-by-wire and shift-by-wire technologies, which manage steering and transmission electronically rather than mechanically and hydraulically, have been gaining substantial attention. This interest has amplified, especially with the advent of software-defined vehicles and the prominence of electric cars in the automotive landscape.

Now, a new frontier is on the horizon: brake-by-wire, a groundbreaking technology set to enable fully electronic brake adjustments. ZF, a trailblazer renowned for its automatic transmissions, has introduced a groundbreaking electromechanical braking system that fundamentally diverges from the traditional fluid-based approach.

This revolutionary system developed by ZF replaces the usage of brake fluid pressure with an electric motor, generating braking force at each wheel. The transmission of braking signals, from the pedal to the motor, operates exclusively within an electrical circuit. This innovative development, stemming from collaborative efforts across ZF’s laboratories in China, the United States, and Germany, was unveiled at the Next Generation Mobility Day in Shanghai, emphasizing software-defined vehicles (SDVs) and electric vehicles (EVs).

According to ZF, the brake-by-wire system not only reduces braking distances but also enhances energy recuperation during braking, thereby contributing to decreased maintenance expenses. In scenarios requiring automatic emergency braking, this system could potentially reduce the braking distance at 100 km/h by up to 9 meters when compared to conventional systems.

Particularly notable advantages are evident in electric vehicles, as the dry system facilitates more efficient recovery of braking energy during regenerative braking, potentially increasing the vehicle’s range by up to 17%. Importantly, ZF claims that drivers will not notice any discernible difference between the brake-by-wire system and the conventional hydraulic brake in terms of performance.